I was speaking with a colleague recently about a project that ran much longer than originally planned, and the discussion eventually moved to Prolongation Claims and how teams determine the additional costs linked to extended durations. I have never dealt with that process directly, so I am curious about how it works in real situations. Do strong project records and regular progress updates make the biggest difference, or are there other factors that help avoid disagreements when time related impacts are being assessed? I would really appreciate hearing experiences from anyone who has gone through something similar.